（ii） the application of the EBR to subject shrimp from India is inconsistent with Articles Ⅰ:1, Article Ⅱ:1（a） and （b）, Ⅹ（3）（a）, Ⅺ:1 and ⅩⅢ of the GATT 1994; and that
（iii） the laws, rules and regulations of the United States that authorize the imposition of the EBR and the instruments comprising the Amended CBD are inconsistent as such with Articles Ⅰ:1, Article Ⅱ:1（a） and （b）, Ⅹ（3）（a）, Ⅺ:1 and ⅩⅢ of the GATT 1994